Archive for November, 2011

What can I do if I am sexually harassed at work?

Thursday, November 10th, 2011
What can I do if I am sexually harassed at work?

What can I do if I am sexually harassed at work?

Sexual harassment can make a work environment uncomfortable and intimidating. Victims of sexual harassment often face anxiety at the workplace and experience a significant impact in their quality of life and work.

Victims of sexual harassment at the workplace go through many emotions such as humiliation, frustration, withdrawal and even suffer damages in the aftermath. Although steps are taken to eliminate sexual harassment cases, employers cannot guarantee that it will discontinue. Surveys show that only a small percentage of women who have been victims of sexual harassment at the workplace actually go through with filing a complaint, for the fear of jeopardizing their careers.

Sexual harassment can occur in any of the following circumstances:

  • The victim or harasser may be a woman or a man
  • The harasser does not necessarily have to be another employee, it may be a supervisor, agent or a non-employee
  • A victim could be someone other than the harassed victim

Unwelcome sexual advances, request for sexual favors or verbal or physical contact of a sexual nature are not legal. You have legalrightsthat can protect you and ensure you work in an environment that is free of sexual harassment.

If you are a victim of sexual harassment, you should first provide a written complaint to your supervisor or any other individual who is responsible. You should include details of the incident and names of witnesses. Your employer should take immediate action. If your employer fails to take action you should contact a sexual harassment lawyer to explore legal protection and grounds for a possible lawsuit. A lawyer can help you file your complaint and help you get the justice you deserve.

If you feel you are a victim of sexual harassment, you should contact a sexual harassment lawyer promptly. Attorney Search Network can refer you to a sexual harassment lawyer to represent you in your sexual harassment claim.

How are retirement accounts like 401K divided in a Divorce without triggering a Tax penalty?

Thursday, November 10th, 2011
How are retirement accounts like 401K divided in a Divorce without triggering a Tax penalty?

How are retirement accounts like 401K divided in a Divorce without triggering a Tax penalty?

Divorcing couples are often concerned with legal fees, child custody and division of assets. Retirement planning may not be priority at first, but it is an inevitable topic for couples going through a divorce.

Divorcing couples typically agree to split and equally divide the funds in their joint savings accounts without any worry – but when it comes to retirement planning, it is not that easy. Taking distribution checks from IRAs or 401Ks are taxable transactions. This is where a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) comes in handy.

A Qualified Domestic Relation Order (QDRO) is an approved order made under family law and property law that regulates the terms of child support, alimony payments, or marital property rights during a divorce. A QDRO is required so that a spouse can receive their share of the former spouse’s retirement benefits. A QDRO allows divorcing couples to split retirement benefits without triggering tax or early distribution penalties.

A QDRO is complex – it is advised to have a QDRO organized by a family lawyer because unless it meets the federal requirements and it is approved by a court, it is deemed invalid.

A family lawyer can prepare and review all QDRO court documents that are required in order to transfer pension plan benefits and retirement accounts from one spouse to the other. A family lawyer can prepare the QDRO, get a judge’s signature, file the QDRO during a divorce proceeding and ensure that the pension plan administrator will implement the QDRO.

If you are going through a divorce and need a family lawyer to organize a QDRO, contact Attorney Search Network today. We can help you find a family lawyer in your area that handles QDRO.

New Law Provides Greater Protection for Homeowners in Default

Thursday, November 10th, 2011
New Law Provides Greater Protection for Homeowners in Default

New Law Provides Greater Protection for Homeowners in Default

On July 15, 2011 Governor Jerry Brown signed California Senate Bill 458 into law.  SB 458 amends CCP §580e to preclude holders of any trust deeds securing residential properties, consisting of dwellings of one to four units, from pursuing a homeowner (trustor or mortgagor) for a deficiency where the holder of the trust deed has agreed in writing to the short sale, unless the homeowner has been guilty of fraud or waste, or unless the homeowner is a corporation or a political subdivision.

Prior to January 1, 2011 there was some uncertainty as to the consequences of a short sale where the holder of the first trust deed decided to pursue a deficiency judgment after the short sale had occurred.  The reason is that a short sale is not a foreclosure and thus was not subject to the anti-deficiency protection of CCP§580d.  In a short sale, the lender in the first position forgives the balance due on the loan and releases the security on the real estate in exchange for a payment of an agreed upon amount by a third party, called the “short sale purchaser.”  While there is no known case where a holder of the first has successfully pursued a deficiency after a short sale, many home owners were unwilling to accept the risk that a lender might attempt to do so and for that reason, they allowed their homes to foreclose rather than enter into a short sale transaction.

To resolve any ambiguity concerning the ability of the holder of the first trust deed to pursue a deficiency after a short sale, the California legislators enacted SB931 which went into effect as CCP§580e on January 1, 2011.  CCP§580e precluded the holder of a first trust deed from pursuing any deficiency after agreeing to a short sale and releasing the security interest.  However, CCP§580e did not address the holders of junior trust deeds.  As a result, many holders of junior deeds were agreeing to a short sale but only if the borrower agreed to negotiate with the junior lien holder after the short sale escrow had closed.

To protect homeowners from holders of junior trust deeds who would seek to recover the deficiency, the legislators amended CCP§580e, to include all trust deed holders on qualifying property regardless of the position they hold, provided the short sale is agreed to by said trust deed holders, and the homeowner has not been guilty of waste or fraud and is not a corporation or a political subdivision.   In other words, holders of junior trust deeds are now barred from seeking a deficiency judgment or suing the homeowner for breach of contract on the loan, after a short sale that they have agreed to occurs.  There is no requirement that the property be the residence of the party who obtains a short sale.  The statute applies to any residential real estate property, consisting of one to four dwelling units, where the holder(s) of the trust deed(s) agrees in writing to a short sale, and the homeowner has not been guilty of fraud or waste and is not a corporation or political subdivision.

As amended CCP§580e now provides even greater protection for homeowners facing foreclosures.  This amendment also specifically states that the borrower cannot be required to pay any additional compensation, aside from the proceeds of the sale, in exchange for the written consent of the sale.  Previously, lenders engaged in fraudulent practices whereby the homeowner, or the buyer, would often be required to negotiate outside of escrow and to secretly pay some amount of money to the second trust deed holder in exchange for a release of the lien.  Not only did this activity constitute mortgage fraud but it was also an illegal practice.  Now it is spelled out clearly by statute that this is prohibited.  Further, the amendment states that any waiver of these protections shall be deemed void and against public policy.  While this amendment may lead to borrowers having a more difficult time obtaining the approval of junior lien holders, it will provide those who do obtain the approval with the peace of mind to know that they are no longer responsible for any deficiency.

DW Duke manages the Inland Empire office of Spile, Siegal, Leff & Goor, LLP and is a member of the California Association of REALTORS Strategic Defense Panel.  Michael Wilson is an associate in the Encino office of Spile, Siegal, Leff & Goor, LLP and specializes in real estate law.